Printer-friendly version   
Original News Release

 

 


  FACTSHEET 

2005AG0036-001081

Nov. 23, 2005

Ministry of Attorney General

     

 

 


Statement of Expenditures for the Air India Trial1

 

Courts - Trial Support and Security Operating Expenditures

$7,753,052

 

Prosecution Expenditures

 

Pre-trial2          

$5,610,144

Prosecution except for Witnesses and Victim Services

$13,249,967

Expert and non-expert witnesses

$1,759,333

Victim Services

$1,766,623

Prosecution total

$22,386,067

 

Justice Services Expenditures

 

Defence Funding

$22,026,914

(Less PST charges included)

($945,105)

Defence Funding before PST

$21,081,809

Administrative

$357,717

Justice Services total

$21,439,526

 

Corrections - Operating/Custody Expenditures

$1,958,581

 

Management Services - Administrative Support Expenditures

$230,718

 

Total Expenditures before Amortization Expense  

$53,767,944

 

Amortization Expense

 

Capital costs3

$7,825,453

Less: net book value

$3,815,903

Air India Share

$4,009,550

 

Total Expenditures before Federal Contributions  

$57,777,494

Less Federal Contribution4

($27,506,527)

 

 

Total Provincial Contribution5

$30,270,967

 

 

NOTES:                                                  

1 The costs represent the expenditures made by British Columbia to mount the Air India trial, excluding police costs. The costs begin with preparations by a small prosecution team starting in 1996; costs for construction, prosecution and defence teams and pre-trial motions after charges were laid in October 2000; and the trial itself, which began in April 2003 and ended in March 2005.  The federal government contributed $1M to BC in the early case preparation phase, then starting in 2001 agreed to contribute approximately 50 per cent of the costs of the trial, including 100 per cent of victim services costs.

 

2 In addition to preparations for the trial by prosecutors of British Columbia's Criminal Justice Branch, the Branch also conducted a prosecution resulting in a conviction in 1991 relating to the Air India case.

 

3 Capital costs are costs such as those incurred to build the high-security Courtroom 20 where the trial took place. The full capital costs cannot be attributed to the Air India case because, for example, British Columbia's court system can now use the courtroom for other cases after the Air India trial. The "amortization" figure therefore represents that part of the capital costs attributable to the Air India case.  The "net book value" figure represents the value of the capital assets not attributable to the Air India trial. The federal government did not contribute to British Columbia's capital costs for the Air India trial.

 

4 British Columbia’s claim for federal contributions for the past two years is being audited by the federal government.

 

5 Not included in this figure are any wind-up costs in 2005/06.

 

-30-


     

Media

contact:

Marisa Adair

Communications Director

Ministry of Attorney General

250 920-8500

 

Visit the Province's website at www.gov.bc.ca for online information and services.